Contax g2 with 45mm fashion samples skin#
Contax g2 with 45mm fashion samples plus#

Very little on this camera is superfluous, and all the switch-gear has a perfectВ amount of feedback in operation. ItвЂ™s titanium sheathed, solid and all-business. Starting with the body, the Contax is a winner. I sorta like thatВ it looks like your grandmaвЂ™s Bell & Howell. Who cares? Lots of people pay extra for a black setup and then tape over the high-contrast nameplate and logos. Champagne instead of the black due to a 40%В price difference. I rounded out the kit with a mint TLA200 from Japan. It costВ around $1100 Canadian for the body, 28mm Biogon, 45mm Planar and 90mm Sonnar, hoods, bags and all that stuff. The G2 kit came from a chap on RFF, the last true ivory towerВ of internet-forum rangefinder-camera snobbery. When it was time to get toВ work again I decided on a Contax. The Contax excelsВ conquers in every way that matters, and falls criminallyВ short in a few ways that areВ easy to overlook if youвЂ™re in the right mindset.ДЄfter the untimely death of my beloved GA645В I spent some time fooling around with point and shoots, some old box cameras and the like. If I could anthropomorphize the G2, itвЂ™s anВ unapologetically awkward, runway-gorgeous genius. ItвЂ™s time to do a review on the Contax G2.

Life with the X100 series: thinking on theВ X100F.Over 500 people have signed up for EMULSIVE Santa 2021, the world's largest annual film/traditional photography gift exchange! Time is short, click here to register by October 31st.

Shot on (i) my Contax G2 and 35 and 45mm lenses (with Velvia 50) and (ii) for featured image, X-Pro1 and Contax/Zeiss 45mm By way of an aside, the 45 makes an excellent short portrait lens when mounted on my X-Pro1 too! No way are any of these perfect, but they have a soul and I like them. ItвЂ™s clear at least that the lenses are sharp and very high quality. On receiving the scans this am from Peak Imaging, I was concerned they wouldnвЂ™t be up to scratch. Never mind, there are always compromises. My only real complaint is the lack of a focus ring and any way to sensibly manually focus. Every bit the equal of Leica lens image quality. However, in general I thoroughly enjoyed shooting with the body. The viewfinder was small and dark (though in its favour, the fact it zooms to reflect the FOV of the lens mounted was very much appreciated) and the shutter speed dial is even more annoying than the one on the Fuji X-pro1 (why the ruddy lock button, why?). The AF is more noisy than IвЂ™m used to but hardly deafening.

Contax g2 with 45mm fashion samples skin#

I loaded up Velvia which was a poor choice for shooting people (because it makes skin tones redder) and I forgot to check the ISO setting on the film, meaning most of the first half of a film was lost. It was liberating not to be in a position to вЂњchimpвЂќ at photos. The AF is very fast and the controls were intuitive in every way. However, with some new batteries, the camera was up and running. The G2 body turned up with dust in the viewfinder, dead batteries in the body and a number of scratches the eBay seller had вЂњforgottenвЂќ to mention. Of course, not everything turned out as I expected it. Way over the top but you donвЂ™t learn by taking baby steps.

Contax g2 with 45mm fashion samples plus#

I picked up a variety of вЂњprofessionalвЂќ films to try out: some Velvia 50, some Ektar 100 and some Ilford B&W FP4 Plus 125. I thought about it and it was a no brainer. I looked on eBay and the body could be picked up for ВЈ200-300. I recalled some articles and blog posts I had read on the Contax G2, an autofocus rangefinder from the mid 90s, that was reckoned to be the equal of a Leica image quality wise. I also saw that I was looking at ВЈ1200 odd for a used example of a Leica M7 on eBay. But while they are capable of stunning output, I know that I have a tendency to use my X-Pro1 more than my M9.

My first thought was to get a film Leica, like a M7 or an MP. No, I wanted to try a quality camera with some quality slide and negative film. Not the old 35mm cameras I recalled from my youth, with slow lenses and more lights than your average christmas tree. The thought occurred to me that I ought to see what shooting a 35mm film camera was like. Hopefully not! I decided more and more that I liked the film-like quality you get from the Fuji X-trans cameras and from the Leica M9.

So what is this? IвЂ™m providing some impressions of a camera launched in 1996 which ceased production in 2005? Am I mad?